Hi richard surckla; Re: "Yes, I am the guilty one. However, not to the extent that you are portraying. I never mentioned sex with anyone or urine. You changed my words and the intent of my post."
That is a lie. I described your post quite accurately. In fact, you agreed with my description of it as a classic, and you did not deny any part of my description of it:
Bilow
Aug 5, 2000
Hi richard surckla; I truly hope that no one has SI delete this message of yours referring to zippers, putting out camp fires with urine, and possible sexual behavior involving yourself and another poster. It is a classic. #reply-14169479
Of course, SI eventually deleted your disgusting message. Then you replied to my above post as follows:
Richard Surckla
Aug 10, 2000
... I have to agree with you, for the first time ever, when you said, "It is a classic." What a shame. Now you will have to say, "It was a classic." #reply-14197581
Sure looks like you didn't feel like denying my description when it was still fresh in everybody's (including your own filthy) mind.
-- Carl
P.S. The long news posts don't take long to put together, but I have to have a decent connection to put them together without wasting a lot of my time. I've got that connection again, and though I previously posted (Oct 27) that the "DDoDDRN" posts were through, if you beg me, repeatedly, over and over, I'll start doing them again. Anything for you. In fact, if your brain were on fire, well, I'll let Zeev finish that thought. |
