SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Neuroscience
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Nikole Wollerstein who wrote (129)11/2/2000 9:19:37 PM
From: Marty   of 278
 
I'm on very thin ice here but I suppose you are pointing out that in the earlier study seems to say that AIT-082 is "... not involved in the cGMP system..."

and in the later study that indicated " ...AIT-082 shows the ability to induce production of neurotrophic factors by modulating carbon monoxide-dependant guanylyl cyclase (cGMP)..."

There are so many words that I don't know in there that I'm not sure of all the implications and import of what they found or the discrepancy, if there is one. I don't really know if one researcher found or concluded one thing and the other one found or concluded something else. Could it be just further light on something that was not fully understood before or even a correction to previous research? Or is this some flaw in one of the studies?

Or have I missed the point altogether?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News