SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Virginia Tech Hokies
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: caly who wrote (40)11/2/2000 10:47:51 PM
From: gregor  Read Replies (1) of 1332
 
Remember the game against Bost Col 2 years ago (or was that last year, can't remember )when Sorensen was QB, and we still won.. hahaha !! That was a classic.
Seriously, against Pitt when Myers came into the game; because Meyers was not the roll out, or option, or QB draw threat that Vick was they stopped blitzing and Myers tore them a new one. He presents many problems in preparation simply because teams do not know how to prepare for him. He also has a much more catchable ball trajectory and throws a beautiful arched ball. Vick OTOH throws hard and flat and the receivers have many problems catching his throws....so in conclusion there may not be as much difference as one might think..the major drawback is that Myers ball is much more likely to be intercepted imo and Miami partly came back against WVU and won the game because of an interception that was run back for a TD.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News