SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Mike M2 who wrote (33533)11/3/2000 11:25:27 AM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) of 436258
 
The police have the right to conduct a warrantless search of an automobile when the driver is being arrested, but not when he is merely being issued a citation. Knowles v. Iowa, 525 U.S. 113 (1998). The rationale is officer safety, if a person is being arrested he may become violent in order to get away, but not if he is merely being given a citation. I had to look that one up because the law on that topic is in constant flux. They also have the right to do a warrantless search to get evidence, and the law on that is very complex, it has to do with open containers and plain view and so forth.

The officer has the right to briefly pat down a suspect if he has reasonable suspicion that the suspect may be armed, that's Terry v. Ohio and I don't have to look that one up.

The police have the right to do an inventory search of a car that is being impounded.

But my point is that you should never consent because then you can never challenge probable cause. They may do it anyway, but if you don't consent your lawyer will have something to work with.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext