(LVLT) - Level 3 Communications Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : (LVLT) - Level 3 Communications

LVLT 53.63

0.0%

Nov 1 5:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: SecularBull who wrote (2576)	11/3/2000 11:50:51 AM
From: IngotWeTrust	Read Replies (1) of 3873

You know something, LoF, you'd make a lousy debater: I've stated my reasons for relying upon MY personal observation of LVLTs install up close and personal, and the conclusions I HAVE DRAWN from same. I'm NOT relying upon either WSJ OR LVLT's mgmt utterances. I just happen to THINK WSJ reporter got it "right" in Jan 20 1998 cite. You don't. That's cool. I happen to think the CA article about LVLT basically being stopped cold down there outside of LA is also "accurate." You probably don't. That's cool. I happen to think that LVLT's mgmt will be uttering, "Opps we didn't quite make it by our 1st Q 2001 goal" quote/utterance/statement you are relying upon, either sooner or later. You probably don't. That's cool. Once again: you asked eezie for a specific thread cite: he provided you one, I provided you ANOTHER one. You beat up on me, You ignore him. You're funny!! Of course you have an issue with the WSJ...otherwise you would NOT have "written them off" as a non-reliable source for information, on LVLT or any other stock I s'pose. Next, you'll probably claim that WSJ's staff writer made it all up and never interviewed LVLT's mgmt before he wrote that article I cited at your request? Go take your blood pressure meds and hang on to your wallet: at the rate LVLT's share price is getting lopped off here of late, (new 52 week low at $37 and change this morning I see) they're bound to hit your low buy-in point you have posted about earlier on this topic and you'll really be in a snit. Nothing wrong with believing in Jim Crowe... but HIS 5K+ share sells every 24 hours or so for months and months and months are looking downright prescient, now on that can we agree?<g> I gotta go play in the mud...c'ya later One thing's for certain...I'll have more yellow in my pan today than you will..guarandamnteeya!

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next