Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)

AMD 213.43

+6.2%

Dec 19 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Joe NYC who wrote (18027)	11/7/2000 9:15:53 AM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) of 275872

Joe, RE:Itanium I admit that I am only going by what is on Ace's, I am am not aware of any other source on a McKinley delay. Aside from the stuff on Ace's, McKinley has been more or less penciled in for Q2/Q3 of next year. And I agree, my initial impression was McKinley was supposed to be 0.18 micron. But if this from the upcoming ISSCC is McKinley "At the IA-64 level, Intel bumps up by 1.5 times the frequency of its current 64-bit processor in a 1.2-GHz design that exploits 3.3 Mbytes of on-die cache, " there is no way that this will be on 0.18 micron. The cache alone would be 350mm^2 or so, the whole chip would exceed 500mm^2 (or at least get close). But the speed of 1.2GHz is in the range of where McKinley is supposed to be...

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next