SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Sound Off - Speak Your Mind

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: HairBall who wrote (69)11/7/2000 1:25:03 PM
From: No Mo Mo  Read Replies (1) of 595
 
LG-

Seems we may have a little breakdown in communication here.

To Flatsville you said:

"Of course certain items of necessity should be tax-free. Those that are poor can direct their monies toward those necessities that are tax-free, thus keeping their taxes low. Those that are well off or rich that make decisions to buy luxury items would do so knowing they will pay taxes on those items."

And to me you said:

"I am not implying that luxury items should be taxed at a higher rate. The tax rate should be the same for all taxable items. Noting that certain necessities such as food, health care, etc would be non-taxable. I suspect that housing and utilities would be non-taxable up to a limit, so all the necessities are covered. Then all taxable items should be taxed at the same rate."

Taxable/Non-Taxable...
I'm not talking about different rates beyond this one, discreet line. Are we talking about the same thing?

If health care is non-taxable, does that mean ALL health care? What services or products get deemed luxury as opposed to necessity? Some would argue preventative care is necessary. Some would view it as a luxury.

-Darin
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext