SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm
QCOM 178.63-1.3%Oct 29 3:59 PM EDT

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Michael Allard who wrote (5)6/26/1996 11:08:00 AM
From: Ramsey Su   of 68
 
Michael, reflecting on the events last week, I think the timing was very unfortunate. As a long term holder of QCOM, the net effect is really zero.

If you recall, Dr. J was interviewed the day before the $850M announcement. Dr. J has never been known to hype QCOM and his charisma is not exactly at par with Gates, Ellison, McNeal etc. I have to assume that while he was being drilled on TV, he already knew that $850M of orders are in the books but he can't say a thing.
If only the interview was a day after the announcements, he could have easily answered those questions with authority.

Second piece of bad timing was the 2 order announcements came on the same day. It would have had a much bigger impact if they were announced a few days apart. It is my understanding the Sprint announced earlier than planned because they don't want to appear too far behind Primeco.

As for next Q's earnings, I think the number is going to be overwhelmed by news of revenue, back orders, future outlook etc etc. Use BAY as an example. Their E met expectations but revenue was lower and the future does not look as bright as the street expected. In QCOM's case, E may disappoint but the future couldn't look brighter. If Dr. J would turn the podium over to a better spokesperson when the earnings come out, QCOM could start its rise to 80, 90 or more.

Ramsey
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext