SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 231.94+0.1%Jan 20 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Alighieri who wrote (18128)11/7/2000 10:38:41 PM
From: fyodor_Read Replies (1) of 275872
 
<Al: I don't believe that Intel is screening AMD from access to these nor from the latest advancements in litho equipment. Info on both techniques.>

Thanks for the link. It provides a nice overview.

Just for the record, I wasn't trying to imply any sort of "foul play" by Intel. I was simply saying that a shortage of equipment could hurt AMD.

I don't agree with you about the current usage of PSM and OPC, though. See e.g. the following dated September 4 this year (also mentions DuPont Photomasks Inc):

electronicnews.com

I realize that PSM is certainly applied to some extent, but take the following from the above source:

DPI and its customers believe altering aperture phase-shift masks will extend 248-nanometer lithography to the 0.13-micron node before 193nm lithography becomes widespread at the 0.13- and 0.10-micron levels with OPC and embedded phase-shift masks.

Edit: So what I may have been referring to is embedded psm, although I'm not really sure what technical differences these terms cover.

-fyo
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext