SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 213.43+6.2%Dec 19 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: combjelly who wrote (18030)11/8/2000 1:12:38 AM
From: Paul EngelRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
Re: "But if this from the upcoming ISSCC is McKinley "At the IA-64 level, Intel bumps up by 1.5 times the frequency of its current 64-bit processor in a 1.2-GHz design that exploits 3.3 Mbytes of on-die cache, " there is no way that this will be on 0.18 micron. The cache alone would be 350mm^2 or so, the whole chip would exceed 500mm^2 (or at least get close). But the speed of 1.2GHz is in the range of where McKinley is supposed to be... "

That's McKinley all right - and the 3.3 MBytes of cache is correct.

Of course, the 0.13 micron/copper follow-on version of McKinley will contain "substantially more" cache.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext