Goldfinger = manipulator = scam artist
You are full of cow manure. You posted the same BS last Nov not long before the stock started its move from about where it is now to 36. Nice call, moron! How much did you lose that round? You back for your round 2 loss?
Message 11839101
You illiterates have been comparing Gum Tech to Quigley for nearly two years and Quigley still doesn't have a functional chewing gum business. Quigley doesn't even have the expertise to make nicotine gum, dental gum, or other functional chewing gums. An analogy would be to compare Warner-Lamber, maker of Halls Cough Drops, to Quigley just because both companies make lozenges for the common cold. Another analogy is to say that Atmel and Motorola are exactly the same just because they both make integrated circuits. Never mind that Motorola makes cell phones and Atmel doesn't have a remotely similar business. There is absolutely no similarity between Quigley and Gum Tech in terms of overall products, financial condition, sales growth, earnings potential, strategy, management, and a host of other factors.
Quigley doesn't own 49% of a joint venture with Swedish Match.
Quigley isn't getting ready to sign a manufacturing agreement with a "major consumer products company" "very soon".
Quigley doesn't have a product that is clinically proven to reduce the duration of the common cold by 75%.
"has no growth"????
What kind of moronic statement is that? Sales increased 39% from 1997 to 1998, 194% from 1998 to 1999, and 27% in the first nine months of 2000 as compared to the first nine months of 1999. You must have missed the company's press release regarding growth in the gum operations.
"In addition, we are moving forward steadily with a major consumer products company to develop and market oral care gum products and anticipate a significant development with respect to this opportunity before year-end. When realized, these opportunities will result in significant growth in our gum operations."
Do you know what significant means? You really do need to borrow Hank's dictionary when he's done with it.
Crim stock? Message 11844381 It's obvious who the crims are here. Two short sellers recently got sued for cybersmearing and one short seller just got out of jail for fraud.
No earnings?
Message 11861637
Gum Tech reported earnings of 14 cents per share in the fourth quarter. Gel Tech contributed earnings of 28 cents per share in the quarter. Cash burn? They had positive cash flow in that quarter, so much in fact that they paid off all their debt.
Hank proven wrong again. Message 12082096 I have lost track of the number of times that Hank's BS has been proven wrong. Publication in ENT Journal puts a nail in the BS in that post.
More crap from Worthington
Message 11837504
GNLN clients own more GUMM now than they ever did...in excess of 5 million shares.
This company isn't running out of cash, moron. They don't have any debt. Do you know what the number 0 means? Maybe you can borrow Hank's dictionary and look it up. Don't you think they would raise cash if they had any working capital needs? They recently paid off Citadel and Textron in full and have excellent credit. Since they haven't raised any capital, it's safe to assume that they don't need any and they surely aren't running out. BTW, they will save about 6 cents per share from Q4 99 because they don't have any interest expense. You can add that to this quarter's profit.
Just as I opined a few days ago, Schneider has been a net buyer of the stock this week. They don't own the fictitious box that you keep speaking of. You are full of crap.
How many shares are you short? Are you in over your head? Is that why you post lies and other crap around the clock? |
