SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : G&K Investing for Curmudgeons
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tekboy who wrote (7827)11/9/2000 2:49:18 AM
From: Mike Buckley  Read Replies (2) of 22706
 
the notion that you have to mark the x "to the right" of the candidate's name.

If we're talking about technical legalities, why is the criterion that the mark be to the right more important than that the mark be an X? The particular ballot in question did not involve making an X. Instead, it involved punching a hole. Is a judge really going to call the ballot illegal because a hole is required instead of making an X? If not, is it still going to be invalid because it is made to the left instead of the right?

--Mike Buckley
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News