SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mr. Pink's Picks: selected event-driven value investments
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Kevin Podsiadlik who wrote (14490)11/9/2000 9:59:50 AM
From: Peter V  Read Replies (2) of 18998
 
I have read that the ballot was not designed by a democrat, but a democrat was on the design committee. Anyway, if you look at the sample ballot from California, the type is plenty large with all the candidates on the same side. In fact, they are now reporting that having candidate names on both sides violates some law, don't ask me which one.

Will it require a re-vote? Again, I don't know. All I'm saying is that the ballot design was stupid. And my original point was to counter the statement that "you don't hear Bush supporters complaining the ballot was confusing." That's because Bush was listed first, and corresponded to the first hole to be punched.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News