SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials
AMAT 319.70+5.9%3:53 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sam Citron who wrote (39333)11/9/2000 12:32:11 PM
From: Robert O  Read Replies (2) of 70976
 
*ot*

Sam and John:

Your arguments are well presented but are entirely moot.
As already presented, ALL parties had an ex ante opportunity
to suggest changes to ballot. ALL accepted ballot in form
used. End of story. REGARDLESS of any ex post 'discovery'
of statistical 'anomalies' there can be no re-vote. In a
sense this was a silent auction. Now that everyone knows
who 'bid' on who, they might change their bid and new
bidders might enter the auction *after the fact*.

Given the database of the country's electorate I guarantee
you any decent statistician could find outliers far more
extreme than this one... should we re-do those areas as well?

I have already commented in an earlier post on the
bizarre nature of the clumsiness of the entire punch-card
process. Why it has taken this to have someone suggest a
better way (Federally) is beyond me. But this one is over,
as the Bard said 'Death, once dead, there's no more dying then.'

Further Affiant Sayeth Naught.

RO
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News