SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Al Gore vs George Bush: the moderate's perspective

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: who cares? who wrote (5331)11/9/2000 7:00:40 PM
From: Ben Wa  Read Replies (1) of 10042
 
send Judicial Watch contributions - they are tax deductable.
I am convinced that Gore will be the next President, why? Not because he won the election fair and square, but because the democratic machine will do anything to insure the outcome they desire. That qualifies as nothing less than a bloodless coup of liberty from the citizens of the United States. It is unfortunate that the situation has gotten THIS bad. We know that the mass media - CNN, NBC, CBS, ABC, etc will not even report major political and economic events that are determining how your children and grandchildren will live. We are fortunate that Mr. Gore invented the internet, since organizations like Judicial Watch have the ability to disseminate information globally and rapidly. Just today, it was reported in AsiaBizTech that China is putting additional restrictions on what can be posted on websites. Is that the direction you want the US headed? Given the concentration of media power in the hands of a few wealthy corporations, I urge you to examine the role that alternative outlets of investigative news reporting should have in our lives.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

11/6/2000
Press Office
202-646-5172

CLINTON-GORE WHITE HOUSE INVOKES
PRESIDENTIAL EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE TO
TRY TO AVOID TESTIMONY ON E-MAIL
SCANDAL

E-Mail Contractor Northrop Grumman Official Also
Testifies Of Coercion To Keep E-Mail Scandal
Secret

Judge Warns White House Not To Destroy Evidence

(Washington, DC) Lost in the news of the 2000 Presidential
election is Judicial Watch’s “trial” concerning the e-mail scandal,
now taking place in the U.S. District Court for the District of
Columbia. Last week, White House counsel Beth Nolan refused to
testify about discussions with the President over the e-mail
scandal, invoking executive privilege. Judicial Watch will be moving
the Court to pierce this privilege. Ms. Nolan’s testimony also
confirmed that the missing e-mails are much more vast than
originally thought. Once produced, they will likely tell the entire
story of the Clinton-Gore scandals over the last 8 years.

In addition, a Northrop Grumman official, Joseph Vasta, testified on
Friday that the Clinton-Gore White House intimidated the e-mail
contractor, Northrop Grumman, into participating in the e-mail
cover-up. Vasta testified that it was made apparent that Northrop
Grumman could lose its $50-million contract if it didn’t play ball
with the Clinton-Gore White House.

Toward the end of the evidentiary hearings last week, The
Honorable Royce C. Lamberth admonished the Clinton-Gore White
House not to destroy e-mail, implying that this could be attempted
after the November 7 election. The Judge reiterated his previous
statement that he would “hang” anyone responsible for such
destruction.

“Judicial Watch plays no part in electoral politics, but we do play a
large part in justice. The criminals of the Clinton-Gore White House
should know that regardless of who wins the election tomorrow,
Judicial Watch will remain on the trail of holding them accountable
no matter how long it takes. Only in this way can we prevent
future criminal enterprises in The White House. There is no political
Messiah, and the American people should not expect that the next
President will seek justice for the Clinton-Gore crimes. That will be
up to Judicial Watch and the courts,” stated Judicial Watch
Chairman and General Counsel Larry Klayman.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext