SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials
AMAT 304.87-0.8%10:17 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (39363)11/9/2000 7:25:34 PM
From: Math Junkie  Read Replies (1) of 70976
 
Brian, you implied that Gore lacks integrity because if he were putting the interests of the nation ahead of his own, he would concede. But that argument assumes that the interests of the country would best be served by his doing so. If he actually believes that the will of the Florida voters was thwarted, then integrity would demand that he pursue the issue by whatever legal means are available. Saying that pursuing litigation is not adhering to the Constitution doesn't make sense, because litigation is provided for in the Constitution, and there is no clause that says that election outcomes are immune to this process.

As far as the popular vote is concerned, Gore said that he would respect the electoral vote. That is not the issue being raised. What they are talking about challenging is the disposition of Florida's electoral votes, due to the alleged irregularities there.

But laying aside the immediate problem, I would bet that if anything would provide the impetus for a constitutional amendment to get rid of the electoral college in the long run, this would be it.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext