Angels of Alchemy Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Angels of Alchemy

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Wes Stevens who wrote (19773)	11/9/2000 7:59:30 PM
From: WhatsUpWithThat	Read Replies (1) of 24256

One thing that is being missed is that they used the same ballot for the last presidential election. They even had some the the same problems i.e. a high number of double punched ballots. No one said a word. Why do they have a right to demand a re-vote on this one? The ballot went through the legal process for approval - more then once. I think that's a telling point, Wes. Spoiled ballots were 50% higher this time, but still... Actually, it's a bit strange, isn't it? If it is the same ballot people have used in the past, you'd think if anything spoiled ballots would be lower, assuming people learn from past experience <gg> I know overall turnout was very high this time, of course; was it also 50% higher than last election? Is there a correlation there? Regards WUWT

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next