SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: B.REVERE who wrote (35982)11/9/2000 9:02:24 PM
From: LLCF  Read Replies (1) of 436258
 
<Do you think the Bush committee would stand aside and not question every close state vote, not have every absentee ballot (over 1,000,000 in Calif. alone) hand counted?>

I think they'd look to recount where it was good for them... and close of course.

<There won't be a new vote. If that happened, what's to prevent other counties from every state in the union
to request a new vote because of "invalid" votes. >

Well, there is no doubt in my mind that if the ballots in question indeed were against state law there would be a re-vote.... unless there was some overriding law against that. Doesn't look like this is the case anyway according to our local 'snoop'.... CB

DAK

DAK
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News