Formerly About Applied Materials Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials

AMAT 307.20

+2.0%

Jan 12 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Cary Salsberg who wrote (39389)	11/9/2000 10:11:18 PM
From: Proud_Infidel	Read Replies (4) of 70976

OT First of all, FLA law mandates that the voter put an "X" to the RIGHT of the person in a WRITE-IN vote. In a vote of this type, that is not applicable since of course this is not a write in ballot. The illegal ballot rhetoric by the dems is false; this was not a write in ballot. As far as the 20,000 voters being "disenfranchised" as many dems claim, what they fail to mention is that 15,000 ballots were spoiled and thus not counted in the '96 election IN THE SAME DISTRICT. This vote has 33% more spoiled votes but the turnout was much greater. The dems did not complain until Gore was behind in the vote. As far as a Revote is concerned, should the people in areas of NM get a revote since there was a snowstorm on the 7th in areas of NM? This is a Slippery Slope we want to avoid. The Democrats unfortunately are not telling the whole truth, and in many cases are telling outright lies. Brian

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next