SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: B.REVERE who wrote (35993)11/10/2000 7:06:16 AM
From: LLCF  Read Replies (1) of 436258
 
<My point was that if a precedent of a re-vote is approved, the election process could continue, ad nauseum,
with every close vote being contested by either party. >

Agreed, a terrible precedent, but in this case it would only be in the event of illegal ballots being used... not with every 'close vote'. It appears from what I'm reading here from CB and others that this is not the case... I'm just saying that if the ballots used in the county [only one in FLA apparently!] were illegal, and someone [group] sues... what do you do??

DAK
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News