SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : TGL WHAAAAAAAT! Alerts, thoughts, discussion.
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: justmickey who wrote (70697)11/10/2000 10:42:48 AM
From: Mr. Darcy  Read Replies (1) of 150070
 
Re: voters' rights, constitution,"rats ass",etc.
Nelson -vs- Robinson,1974,Fl. 1. "mere confusion does not
amount to an impediment to the voters free choice if reasonable time and study will sort it out..."
2.The court made clear that the Constitution assumes the voters "intelligence to indicate his choice with a degree
of care commensurate with the solemnity of the occasion."
3.As to the candidate, the Nelson court declared that he does not have a right to a "particular spot on the ballot which
might make the voters choice easier.His Constitutional rights end when his name is placed on the ballot."
4.More importantly, it is well settled that a candidate may not object to a ballot after an election if he had the chance to object beforehand. Some courts have held that this
type of claim is completely banned.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News