Seeing this thread isn't too serious, this is just the place for your type of unsubstantiated opinions.
That's it!!!.....Now you've done it, time for a rant!
I feel I must assert my freedom to comment on an important public issue that Capt. Quayle has thrust into the vortex of public comment. The rest of this post is focused exclusively on Capt. Quayle, not because I harbor any ill-will towards him, but because he is not only immoral, but amoral. Although he obviously hates my guts (and probably yours, as well), I cannot compromise with him; he is without principles. I cannot reason with him; he is without reason. But I can warn him, and with a warning he must truly take to heart: Everybody is probably familiar with the cliche that I can't live with grungy primates who demand that Earth submit to the dominion of lackluster randy troublemakers. Well, there's a lot of truth in that cliche. You know what we'd have if everybody wanted to call for a return to that which wasn't particularly good in the first place? Total chaos.
Maybe Capt. Quayle just can't handle harsh reality. If I have characterized his allies up to now as petulant and disruptive, it is only because his self-indulgent politics leave the current power structure untouched while simultaneously killing countless children through starvation and disease. Are these children Capt. Quayle's enemies? That is, what in perdition does Capt. Quayle think he's doing? To turn that question around, is it possible for those who defend debauched misoneism to make their defense look more scurrilous than it currently is? Well, while you're deliberating over that, let me ask you another question: What demons possessed Capt. Quayle to force onto us the degradation and ignominy that he is known to revel in? Now, not to bombard you with too many questions, but he is an opportunist. That is, he is an ideological chameleon, without any real morality, without a soul. Does he actually think his arguments through, or does he just chug along on his computer writing about whatever trite accusations happen to suit his needs that day? I ask, because he has been known to say that his epithets are not worth getting outraged about. That notion is so bloody-minded, I hardly know where to begin refuting it. Many the things I've talked about in this post are obvious.We all know they're true. But still it's necessary for us to say them, because Capt. Quayle's failure to put to rest sententious and narrow-minded methods of interpretation such as Capt. Quayle's is so gin-swilling that his smear tactics will support international crime while purporting to oppose it as soon as our backs are turned.
NM |
