SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Piffer OT - And Other Assorted Nuts

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: The Phoenix who wrote (59286)11/10/2000 12:27:24 PM
From: MulhollandDrive  Read Replies (3) of 63513
 
I know you don't want to belabor this, but I want you to understand one thing. The same ballot was used in the last election. There was confusion then. The local election board re-approved it and both sides signed off on the format. They also can be credited with due diligence in trying to prevent any FURTHER confusion by sending out ballots to the voters BEFORE the election and even printing it in the newspaper. The fact is that they chose that specific format in order to FACILITATE the voting of the senior citizens since their judgement was that the larger print would make it easier to read. Well, that judgement was apparently wrong and it backfired. But there is no excuse for "confusion" since every voter had the opportunity to preview the ballot. At some point voters must take responsibility for their own acts. That point is when they deposit their ballot into the ballot box.

This antiquated balloting system was a crises waiting to happen. Now hopefully the pols will get off their duffs and correct it.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext