SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Piffer OT - And Other Assorted Nuts

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (59347)11/10/2000 12:46:28 PM
From: Atin  Read Replies (1) of 63513
 
But this isn't really about sides -- it doesn't matter how incompetent the sides approving the ballots were. The whole point of the exercise is to figure out the will of the people and use that to decide the electoral college votes. So right now the question is whether the will of the people was accurately represented so that the electoral college votes could get to the correct candidate. If a majority of those 19,000 votes really were meant for Gore, that would plain suck if the incompetence of the election officials is what gets a guy who is not the popular choice or the electoral choice in there.

But, I think Gore should let Bush go in -- it would end up being a one term Presidency anyway (with a divided house and senate, not much is going to happen) and Gore would be the leading democratic candidate next time as well as one hell of a shadow president ("I told you so! Elect me next time and I'll fix it!" :) ) since he won the popular vote this time most probably and so this isn't like Michael Dukakis or Walter Mondale. The guy won most probably except for some technical hitches . . . and he'd sound more statesmanlike. And Americans like a good sport.

-Atin
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext