Steve's Channelling Thread Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Steve's Channelling Thread

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (7603)	11/10/2000 2:05:53 PM
From: Dave B	Read Replies (2) of 30051

Zeev, I think that 20,000 is the minimum, since 20,000 ballots were disqualified due to double "punching". Thanks for the clarification. Apparently that lays to rest the "it's too confusing" argument since these voters figured out that they had punched the incorrect selection before they left the voting booth. Apparently we just need to educate voters that you're only allowed to vote for one candidate <G>. I'd have thought that would be obvious, but maybe it's not. Maybe we just need big signs at voting places that say "IF YOU MAKE A MISTAKE, PLEASE TURN IN THE MISTAKEN BALLOT AND GET A NEW ONE". p.s. FWIW I've always thought that Californians should be required to answer a few basic questions about our Propositions before being allowed to vote on them to ensure that they have some clue of what they're voting for. As for financial matters, I'm mostly sitting on a bunch of SSTI, but I'm not confident enough to trade right now. Dave Another election p.s. - CNN just had a "man on the street" interview with New Yorkers. Many of them apparently said that the ballot appeared to be confusing, but virtually all of them pointed to the right spot when asked how they'd vote for Gore.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next