SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 510.18+1.4%Nov 14 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: David Howe who wrote (53030)11/10/2000 2:43:45 PM
From: Nick Kline  Read Replies (2) of 74651
 
If they decide to have a revote (which I am against), they should only let the people vote who voted the first time. They always keep track of who voted and who doesn't. Then the people who messed up their ballots would have a second time to try to avoid screwing it up.

More importantly, just because some stupid people messed up their ballots doesn't mean they should be able to revote. They had their chance.

I think there is a semi-reasonable reason to allow a recount, in that one county with the "flawed" ballot and other places in Florida with similar "flawed" ballots. It doesn't matter really that it was a democrat who created the ballots. There is apparently a state law in Florida that says you have to mark the ballots only to the right of the names. In this case though, the mark is in the middle of the names. That's a reasonable reason to redo the ballot in that county, and I suppose any other counties that have the same kind invalid ballots.

But even with this (flimsy?) (legal?) rationale for a revote, its probably a bad idea. Even though Bush is not my man, we should let the original vote stamd, unless there is serious evidence of deliberate fraud. It sets a bad precedent to have revoting.

It certainly is amusing that first the Repubs thought they'd win the popular vote and lose the electorial college, so they were saying the popular vote was what should count, and now its the other way, and they are happy with it (and now some democrats are grumbling like the republicans before).

-nick
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext