Compaq Message Board - Msg: 14779690

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Compaq

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: The Duke of URL© who wrote (86612)	11/10/2000 3:54:39 PM
From: Meathead	Read Replies (1) of 97611

OT Re: Florida Statutes provides that the box for selecting a candidate should appear to the right of a candidate's name... I'm interested in the exact wording of this statute as "should" is not the same as "must". Either way, as unfortunate as the situation may be for some, especially those who approved the ballot and an entire county which apparently did not register one single objection after a full week of review in their own homes of the ballot, there is no fair way to undo/redo what has already been done. I have not seen one single scenario presented that could possibly be fair regarding a re-vote to determine who really intended to vote for whom. Heck, I intended to sell shares of Dell on Wednesday but actually bought some cause Schwab's website was confusing and I didn't think reading the instructions was all that important. In light of my newfound knowledge, I think Schwab should rewind the tape and let me do it over... honor my original intent -- don't you think<gg>? MEATHEAD

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next