SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Zeev Hed who wrote (41)11/11/2000 2:13:42 AM
From: Carl R.  Read Replies (1) of 644
 
One final comment is that I strongly disagree with the choice of language when people claim that these 20,000 people were "disenfranchised". Their "franchise" is the right to vote. That entitles them to an opportunity to vote, which they got. All rights come with responsibilities, and in this case it is the responsibility to learn about the candidates and issues, and to properly fill out a ballot. If they do not fill it out correctly then whose fault is that? Did they not know that you could only vote for one person? Did they not examine the sample ballot in the newspaper? Did they not examine the sample ballot they got in the mail? Did they elect to not ask any questions at voting time? They had ample way opportunity to learn to how to vote, the opportunity to ask questions, and and even the opportunity to complain about the ballot prior to voting if they couldn't understand it.

They weren't disenfranchised". They simply failed to take advantage of their "franchise", and it completely through their own fault. Furthermore they weren't the only ones nationwide that this happened to. In the rest of the country no doubt hundreds of thousands of votes were no doubt thrown out for the same reason, just as they should have been.

Carl
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext