VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: hivemind who wrote (14413)	11/11/2000 6:47:15 AM
From: Jill	Read Replies (1) of 65232

The right to vote is rather sacred. I want to see it protected from error as well as from intentional abuse What intentional abuse could there be if it was a previously used ballot, approved by both parties, and the Democratic person who helped create it was actually trying to help the Palm Beach residents by making the print larger (that's one reason it was on two pages like that). She is completely stunned and very upset and can't sleep because people are suing her and she had only good intentions. Hive, please get a bit of a grip about the FUD--you're believing all of it. You're apparently believing people tried to ask for new ballots and were refused and that this was somehow intentional abuse, to give people confusing ballots, as if anybody KNEW the state of Florida would be this close, and figured that only those who want Gore would screw up. Clearly this will jumpstart a move to create a national format for ballots, and that's a good thing. But that's for next time.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next