SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 94.48+0.3%Dec 24 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Scumbria who wrote (60851)11/11/2000 11:13:44 AM
From: Dave B  Read Replies (2) of 93625
 
Scumbria,

The question completely threw Dukakis for a loop, and he actually did a very good job maintaining his composure. It was the opening question of the debate, and was rather shocking.

There's an old saying that a Republican is a Democrat who's been mugged and a Democrat is a Republican with a pregnant daughter.

In other words, lofty ideas and principals tend to flee when the situation actually impacts us directly. Dukakis was a very strong anti-death penalty proponent. The question was about how deeply his convictions really ran.

And while that was only one factor in his loss, there were at least three others that I can think of. First was the convicted killer (Willy something, I think) who he had released and who had then killed again. Second was that dorky picture of him sitting in the tank looking like he wasn't sure if he had the helmet on frontwards or backwards. And third was the perception that he was a limp noodle, that there was no fire or passion driving himm (which was probably reinforced by his answer to Shaw's question).

If he had stood up and said "who ever hurt Kitty would not be able to run far enough to escape me, nor would I ever stop looking for him, and I'd put him in a hole so deep that it'd take a week for the sunlight to get down to him" he could have shown that he had both the strength of his anti-death penalty convictions as well as some emotion inside.

Contemplating the possible rape and murder of your wife is not be an "intellectual" exercise, and you shouldn't be able to maintain your "composure".

Dave
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext