SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 510.37+1.4%Nov 14 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Valley Girl who wrote (53168)11/11/2000 3:01:50 PM
From: Thunder  Read Replies (1) of 74651
 
Since performing such recounts only in precincts carried by Gore would be unfair, Mr. Bush should have responded by called for his own manual counts in the precincts he won, or if necessary the entire state.

Now they are setting aside those ballots that may have an indication of a mark, but not fully punctured, that will need to be defined as the "intent" and the "will" of the selectors; by other people. Argh. Then there's those "phantom ballots", which there were selections made, but, without a Presidential candidate selected at all. The Dem's, of course, are now asking: "Can you really honestly believe they didn't intend to vote for a President". This really is a sink hole, no matter what Bush did, or did not do. Like they said: "It's not the accuracy they are looking for, but rather the most recent results that count, for them". True, they could counter the favorable variant results with selected counties of there own, but he would have been damned-if-he-did that too.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext