Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 174.35

-0.4%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: jmac who wrote (87044)	11/11/2000 3:03:00 PM
From: Roadkill	Read Replies (3) of 152472

OT >>So, it's OK to handcount in a republican county which resulted in 98 or 97 more votes being added to Bush but it is not ok to follow that same procedure in the state of florida now because it is unconstitional. that's, great. i look forward to a fair and honest republican administration.<< IMO, the first recount can be done be whatever means a party requests. I am not aware that the dems requested a handcount in Palm Beach the first time. They were satisfied with a machine recount. When that did not produce results that satisfied them, the dems wanted a second recount. My point isn't that I'm anti-recount, or even anti-hand recount. My point is that there should be no more than one recount. The nation cannot permit Gore to keep recounting until he gets the right number, only to have Gore immediately demand Bush concede despite Bush apparently winning the first two counts (which are historically the most accurate). Gore has lost twice now in Florida. Assuming that the absentee ballots do not make up the difference, he must put the country's interests over his own and walk away. And FWIW, I am not aware of any constitutional right to have one's ballot counted by hand. I'd like to see the dems' arguments for why this must be done. RK

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next