Electoral College 2000 - Ahead of the Curve Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Electoral College 2000 - Ahead of the Curve

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Triffin who wrote (1841)	11/11/2000 5:24:49 PM
From: Kevin McKenzie	Read Replies (2) of 6710

Do you think electronic voting is less prone to mistakes and tampering than is paper-punch voting? Don't you think a screen layout could be designed in a more or less confusing way, just as a paper-punch ballot can be? I'm not disagreeing with your opinion that voting should be electronic. I'm just pointing out that there is no panacea for human error or malice. As I understand it, not too long ago machine tabulation was considered more reliable than hand counting. Now, some are arguing that hand counting is more reliable because it allows the tabulators to divine the true intent of the voter. 200 years from now, when each citizen has a wire plugged directly into his/her head, that allows him/her to vote telepathically, a vote will be close, and the citizens will demand that each voter record his/her vote on paper, so the votes can be properly audited. There will be allegations made by the Socialist Party that the Green Party (whose candidate narrowly won the 13 Guam electoral votes) somehow made 3,000 Guamians think about the wrong candidate right when the votes were tabulated. The only reason this is an issue, is because the vote is so close.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next