Jon K. Palm Beach Cnty fraud?? Did you see this. I wonder? The protests seemed too well orchastrated as did the instantaneous appearance of Jessie Jackson and others to generate a strong offense on the issue.
JohnG
freerepublic.com
Crime/Corruption Breaking News Free Republic Keywords: PALM BEACH VOTE FRAUD CORRUPTION
Source: Robert Cook
Published: 10 November 2000 Author: Robert A. Cook, PE
Posted on 11/10/2000 15:30:43 PST by Robert A. Cook, PE
Ref: 15,000 Bush votes were stolen in Palm Beach, FL. 15,000 Dole and Perot votes were stolen in 1996 *, no wonder
they knew how to do it!
(*9 Nov, 2000 CNN; Jim Smith, Former Florida Secretary of State; WSJ, 11-10-2000)
The news media is focused on the Democratic Party spin that voters were "confused" in Palm Beach, FL. They are
ignoring the 15,000 BUSH and 3,400 Buchanan votes were stolen by fraud in these 19,000 ballots.
There is explicit statistical evidence of massive ballot tampering in Palm Beach FL. These ballots show Democratic
voter fraud....NOT Republican fraud or "voter error." Consider these "unusual" ballot problems in Palm Beach, FL -
every one of them adds more Gore votes, and removed Republican and Reform party votes.
---...---
The voter fraud in the most heavily Democratic precincts Palm Beach County is so bad that Democratic officials are
claiming that over 26 people per minute "were confused" and voted twice for President! This means that more voters
were being handed new ballots per minute than new voters were being signed in. (19,200 "double punched" Democratic
ballots divided by 12 hours, there are approximately 100 precincts in Palm Beach County. The errors are concentrated in
only a few of these of these precincts, ALL predominately democratic and ALL with Democratic voter officials.)
---...---
ONLY in Palm Beach FL were 15,000 ballots "double punched" in the 1996 election. (This is unique among the entire
nation! It is an error rate TEN TIMES larger than reported in ANY other district in the nation using that kind of ballot!)
ONLY in Palm Beach (and almost ONLY heavily Democratic precincts) were 19,200 ballots rejected in 2000 for
double punching....(This is a 4.4% error rate overall; in the rest of Florida there is less than ½ of ONE percent "double
punch" error rate! (Unofficially, this error rate was 15% in predominately Afro-American precincts, and 10% in
precincts with large numbers of Jewish retirees.) In strongly Republican precincts, the error rate was the "usual" ½ of
one percent.)
ONLY in Palm Beach did this "double punch" error happen ONLY in the Gore-Bush-Buchanan selection. (In a truly
random "error," the mistakes happen in every race, all at about the same rate. In Palm Beach, the massive errors (over
19,000) ONLY happened in the Presidential race.)
ONLY in Palm Beach has the news media complained about "massive" ballot confusion. In the 43 counties in Missouri,
also mostly Democratic voters, which use the same kind of ballot, there are NO complaints about "confused voters" at
all. (St Louis Post Dispatch, Nov 8, 2000) Therefore, ONLY in Palm Beach FL do the Democrats have to "explain" a
massive number of incorrect votes.
ONLY in Palm Beach did Gore GAIN 750 votes in a recount. In 64 out of 67 counties in FL, the average gain was 5-7
votes, and the "changes" were equally split between ALL the candidates, in proportion to the original number of votes.
This means that Palm Beach FL had an error rate in favor of Gore more than 120 TIMES greater than any other county,
(Two other heavily Democratic "inner city" counties (Flagler and Pinellas) had changes greater than 400 votes.) In a
statistically valid recount, half of the errors would favor Bush, and half favor Gore. This extreme change from the normal
in only three counties shows massive "favoritism" towards Gore in those three counties.)
In Palm Beach Gore got more votes than there are registered Democrats. (Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections:
registered Democrats = 296,122 while Gore voters = 296.696.)
ONLY in Palm Beach did Bush receive LESS than 65% of the registered Republican voters. (Registered Republicans =
231,626 while Bush voters = 152,954.) In every other county in FL Bush received MORE votes than there were
registered Republicans. In the rest of the nation, poll results show more than 90% of registered Republicans actively
supported the Republican candidate.
(Also, unique in the entire state, the percentage of Republican voters COUNTED as voting in Palm Beach was much less
than normal, despite the pre-election attention to Florida as a critical state; and massive Republican get-out-the-vote
campaigns.)
ONLY in Palm Beach did Buchanan get less than HALF the of votes he received before in 1996. His losses in that county
in 2000 were much greater than in any other district in Florida. (Buchanan received over 8,000 votes in 1996 Republican
PRIMARY (where only registered Republicans can vote; but he received only 3,407 under the Reform Party from ALL
voters in the 2000 Presidential election.
(Pat Buchanan has relatives who lives in Palm Beach County, and this local support greatly increase the number of local
voters who choose Buchanan, compared to every other region of the country. There are over 14,551 members of the
Reform party in Palm Beach County - which indicates that less than 1/5 of the Reform voters voted for their own
candidate. The Fraud is NOT whether Gore voters were "confused" and voted for Gore, but rather WHY Reform Party
and Libertarian voters were prevented from registering THEIR vote!)
ONLY in Palm Beach County did the Reform Party candidate for Senator get MORE votes than the the reform Party
candidate for President (Buchanan)...in every other coutry, the candidate for Senator for EVERY party got FEWER votes
than the candidate for President from that party did.
---...---...
There is a simple, single explanation for ALL of these 19,000 problems in ONE set of ballots in ONE district in ONE
state.
15,000 Bush ballots, and 3,400 more Buchanan ballots, were double-punched to imitate a Gore vote, AFTER legitimate
left their polling booth.
Assume 35,000 ballots were stuck with a stiff wire. It would take somebody a little bit of privacy and about 15 minutes.
A ream of paper is 1 inch thick, 35,000 many ballots can be carried by one person in one small box, damaged, and
returned to position very quickly.
Originally,
3,000 = Buchanan
15,000 = Bush
15,000 = Gore
1,250 = other parties
750 = "blank" - No vote for President; other spots may be filled in.
After ....
3,000 Buchanan + Gore = thrown out.
15,000 Bush + Gore = thrown out.
Gore (+ Gore) = GOOD VOTES for Gore = counted already
1,250 + others + Gore = thrown out.
750 = "blank" + Gore = Gore gets recount!
Stamping 35,000 ballots with a wire THROUGH the Gore slot gives:
Every Gore vote = still a valid Gore vote. (No change in the total, no change in the recount.)
Every Bush, Buchanan, Workers Party, and Libertarian Party ballot IS IMMEDIATELY INVALID. They will be thrown
out because they have two votes. They NEVER were counted in the first place = no change in the recount.
EVERY ballot that HAD NO VOTE becomes a Gore vote.
The recount immediately ADDS these (751) ballots to the Gore column BECAUSE the original count had NO vote for
president!
(Isn't it LIKELY that at least 750 people were disgusted with BOTH major presidential candidates and made NO vote
for president?)
The key: KEEPING THE BALLOTS as evidence. IMMEDIATELY!
2. RECOUNTING them by hand...since the voting machine will reject them....if the percentages match these numbers
THERE WAS FRAUD.
3. Finding out WHEN these ballots were thrown out - OR NEVER COUNTED AT ALL! will tell you when the fraud
was done.
.... If the ballots include an equal number of Bush + Gore" and "Gore + Gore" ballots....then that shows that this set of
ballots were tampered with and never counted in the first place ... because they KNEW that they "all" be excluded. IF the
ballots include "no" (or very few) Bush + Buchanan, or "Buchanan + somebody + Gore votes" else....then it shows that
they were deliberately tampered with to exclude (throw out) otherwise valid Bush votes.
Obviously....EVERY tampered ballot WILL include a GORE vote! That would "justify" the Democratic "claims" for
Fraud BY the Republicans.
To verify this....count the doubled ballots, list each with what OTHER votes were cast. No "legitimate" Gore voter
would choose other Republican choices, or at least very, very few would. IF almost all of the Bush + Gore ballots had
mostly Republican choices, or blanks where there is a Democrat running unopposed, then that shows a Bush vote that
was destroyed.
ONLY where the Gore + Buchanan ballots shows almost all Democrats, those "one or two" ballots will show the few
cases where some Gore supporter actually got confused!
BUT the Democrats are claiming that these are "double -punched! They know...and were told early this morning! to
collect 3000 old folks who could claim they were confused...They quickly needed a cover story to explain that the
ballots were "confusing" to create the 3000 Gore - Buchanan "voters" that they need.
But today...even the local democratic officials couldn't "find" that many confused individuals so quickly. Now, they
claiming "hundreds" - and can't even verify that many. No lists, no names, no verification. Just their verbal claims on TV.
---...---
THEY HAVEN'T EXPLAINED why 15,000 ballots were double-punched in 1996 AND in 2000. Other than that the
election officials did it TWICE.
Much simpler to stack the ballots up so they all can be read by the machine.....that way the "holes" line up!
Don't bother reading them or even looking at them, it's faster that way. just grab an unsorted stack of ballots from the box.
Get about 100 -150 ballots - drill a hole through the Gore punch, or use a stiff wire - it will take you about 5 seconds per
stack.
(If you use a drill - the "holes" will look funny - BUT these ballots are NOT meant to be counted again. They were meant
to be thrown out as duplicates! If you use a stiff wire...there is nothing to see.
IF THE HOLE WAS PUNCHED BY WIRE - THE hole will be ragged and torn, the paper will "ahnging" because the
ballot below will prevent the hole from being torn cleanly!
Put the stack back in the box...grab another bunch.
The "good" Gore ballots will still have the original "hole" punched out ... and so will get "re-counted" along with all the
rest.
---...---
To test this theory....Manually count the double-punched ballots - looking for fraud under rules of evidence - this has
become a criminal CASE - the examiners do not have to look for "missed" Gore votes.....The Gore votes ARE the
evidence of fraud.
A Republican voter will have in almost every case have punched Bush + several other Republican candidates.
So look for how many "Bush + Gore" ballots have mostly Republican choices below. THESE ARE FRAUDS. They
represent Bush votes that were stolen.
A "true" Buchanan voter would have punched Buchanan and a mix of other candidates....A Libertarian voter would have
almost "had" to select other Republican candidates....since there are few Libertarian candidates for every position.
Either of these are frauds too!
A "mistaken" "Gore into Buchanan" voter would ALMOST CERTAINLY chosen the Democrats in the rest of the
ballot.....or, IF AS THEY CLAIM, those "Gore into Buchanan" voters that were "told to push the second hole" really
meant "only followed directions" ---- THEN the rest of the ballot would be solid Democrat, or blank.
After all...nobody "told" them to vote for anybody else!
The few "Gore + Buchanan" ballots that are totally blank below - or have many other mistakes on them .. are the only
ones that "might be" mistakes.....two or three people are sure to made errors.
NOT 15,000 voters in 1996....and 15,000 voters in 2000.
When NO OTHER county in the nation has that many errors.
The Democrat demand to "hand count" ballots on Saturday (11 Nov) will destroy the fingerprint evidence of who
commited this fraud.
Also, the democrat demand to hand count these ballots and "look at" the punches "to determine the intent of the voter"
will specifically be looking at the WRONG evidence: they are going to use the potential evidence of fraud (hanging
paper threads on a Gore+ Buchanan or Gore + Bush ballot) as evidence of a GORE vote.
IF the hole is legitimately punched - the the hole was made in the machine, at the ballot box, the hole is "clean" - the pice
of paper goes through and goes away because the "back" of the ballot machine is "open" to specifically allow that!
IF the ballot is "double punched" by a wire through MANY ballots AT THE SAME TIME ... which creates many
THOUSAND "double punched" ballots - ALL with GORE votes + somebody else's "valid" votes that are REJECTED -
then the "hole" CAN'T be cleanly punched and is "messy" WITH DANGLING PAPER and "almost" attached punches....
THE EVIDENCE THE HAND_COUNT IS LOOKING FOR IS EVIDENCE OF 15,000 BUSH BALLOTS THAT WERE
VOIDED BY THE DEMOCRATS!
1 Posted on 11/10/2000 15:30:43 PST by Robert A. Cook, PE (cook.r@csaatl.com)
[ Reply | Private Reply | Top | Last ]
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
bUMP--bUMP---Anybdody call Austin???? Call Sean Hannity?? Call Rush!!! If true it is historical!!!!!!!! bob
2 Posted on 11/10/2000 15:36:16 PST by BobFromNJ (RDONO888@BLAST.NET)
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
WOW! BUMP!
3 Posted on 11/10/2000 15:38:38 PST by PGalt
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Per Limbaugh (11/10/2000) who referenced calls to polling place worker by Mary Matlin, the 19,000 ballots were
discarded ballots that were replaced at the time of polling so the associated voters could properly vote.
No one was 'disenfranchised'. No one missed their opportunity to vote.
4 Posted on 11/10/2000 15:39:14 PST by jimkress
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
To: BobFromNJ
big time bump
5 Posted on 11/10/2000 15:39:45 PST by AAABEST
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | Top | Last ]
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
bump!
6 Posted on 11/10/2000 15:40:03 PST by Shukendesu
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
No, it's just that the ballots will be counted until the total results in a Gore victory. Shrub is protesting but not very hard.
Shrub is doing an Ashcroft.
James Baker led off the AlwaysBillClinton news. He accused the Dems of prolonging the election. This sounds great
until you realize this precludes Bush from prolonging the election by recounting the four other uncertain states.
FL will be recounted until the first time Gore wins and then the counting will stop in FL and anywhere else. And Shrub
won't even bleat.
We've been doled.
7 Posted on 11/10/2000 15:41:16 PST by spudsmaki
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
To: AAABEST
Bumpmark!
8 Posted on 11/10/2000 15:43:10 PST by abner
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | Top | Last ]
To: Robert A. Cook, PE, Bryan
Great find,
FYI
9 Posted on 11/10/2000 15:43:26 PST by Free the USA
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
wow, bump!
10 Posted on 11/10/2000 15:43:54 PST by Yellow Rose of Texas
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
To: BobFromNJ, JimRob;
If it is true?
This Post is as true as 1 plus 1 equals 2
11 Posted on 11/10/2000 15:44:15 PST by Common Tator
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | Top | Last ]
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Very interesting. Why is there a need for a hand count in Palm Beach and three other heavily Demo counties? We now
know the Florida ballots are legal. We now know the status of the 19000 ballots. All counties including the four have
been counted twice already. So what is the basis for looking for almost but not quite punched out holes in four Dem
counties? Only Palm Beach had the confusion issue which is different from the punching a properly deep hole rather than
punching the hole in the wrong place.This question may the crux of the reason the Florida GOP is filing suit to stop the
hand counting.
12 Posted on 11/10/2000 15:44:43 PST by Theresa
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
To: Shukendesu
CAN SOMEONE GET THIS TO BUSH CAMPAIGN????
13 Posted on 11/10/2000 15:45:52 PST by L`enn
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | Top | Last ]
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Interesting. But is anyone except you saying this? Are there any credible sources? A single shred of evidence that this has
occurred?
Brilliant theory and good writing, I suppose. But is there any evidence to your assertion?
14 Posted on 11/10/2000 15:47:02 PST by George W. Bush
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
As I think I told you already, I was suspecting this same thing; thanks for posting it. Another possible mode of fraud is
that ballots may have been pre-punched for Gore. If a voter votes for Gore, no problem. If no vote for pres, no
problem--they voted for Gore too. If they tried to vote for someone else, well oops...
I know I checked my ballot for any stray holes, but does everyone? I think it would be easy for a ballot worker to have a
"book" of pre-punched ballots they hand out to people who they think are unlikely to notice.
15 Posted on 11/10/2000 15:47:02 PST by supercat
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Excellent research. This has GOT to get to the Bush campaign somehow. I would suggest you contact them as you did the
work and can quickly answer questions they may have.
16 Posted on 11/10/2000 15:47:22 PST by Vermonter
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
To: L`enn
BUMP
17 Posted on 11/10/2000 15:47:55 PST by sleeper-has-awakened
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | Top | Last ]
To: sheltonmac
BUMP A must read.
18 Posted on 11/10/2000 15:48:23 PST by sola gracia
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
It really depends on what the meaning of "evidence" is, you know...
19 Posted on 11/10/2000 15:48:25 PST by Ichabod Walrus
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Call in Larry Klayman and the Judicial Watch team! Stop this corruption now!
20 Posted on 11/10/2000 15:49:01 PST by Grassontop (Judicial watch may be the answer!)
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Bump! Interesting theory.
21 Posted on 11/10/2000 15:50:20 PST by jazzraptor
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Your an incredible genius!!!!!!!!!
22 Posted on 11/10/2000 15:50:28 PST by truth_eagle
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
To: Ichabod Walrus
It really depends on what the meaning of "evidence" is, you know...
Someone should, at minimum, do a tally of all combinations of presidential holes that appear on those multiply-punched
ballots, and how they correlate with Congressional choices. If this fraud is what's afoot, such a tally will make it quite
clear.
23 Posted on 11/10/2000 15:50:56 PST by supercat
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | Top | Last ]
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Great analysis! The actuarial evidence is very credible. A clear mind in the midst of spin.
24 Posted on 11/10/2000 15:51:16 PST by UnBlinkingEye
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Wowsers! BUMP! I wish I could post this to my egroups entertainment list where they're caterwauling about Republican
fraud in Florida. But they don't want to hear anything negative about the Dems. I'm ticked that certain posters take over a
list and push their political viewpoint, when the list isn't even about politics. The lib Dems are sick puppies.
25 Posted on 11/10/2000 15:51:23 PST by Ciexyz
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
When they hand count the random ballots the wire punch should be found if someone is aware and on the lookout .
26 Posted on 11/10/2000 15:51:58 PST by Big Horn
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
To: truth_eagle
Your an incredible genius!!!!!!!!!
Actually, his theory might be quite credible. Except to the credulous.
27 Posted on 11/10/2000 15:52:11 PST by George W. Bush
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | Top | Last ]
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
One operative at 4 seconds per ballot with one voting punch could punch 15,000 ballots in 17 hours. This sounds very
feasible.
28 Posted on 11/10/2000 15:52:30 PST by RightWhale
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
To: BobFromNJ
Bump. Bump.
29 Posted on 11/10/2000 15:54:54 PST by the_Watchman
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | Top | Last ]
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
ONLY in Palm Beach County did the Reform Party candidate for Senator get MORE votes than the the reform Party
candidate for President (Buchanan)...in every other coutry, the candidate for Senator for EVERY party got FEWER
votes than the candidate for President from that party did.
I dont think you are correct here. Joel Deckard was the Reform candidate for the Senate in Florida. He received 1282
votes (0.29%) in Palm Beach County. Buchanan received 3407 votes (0.79%) in Palm Beach County. Palm Beach
County election results.
Dont get me wrong. I think there are some serious problems in this county. But I dont think some of your "facts" are
correct.
30 Posted on 11/10/2000 15:55:15 PST by Methos8
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
To: George W. Bush
I meant it!! This is really a brilliant analysis.
31 Posted on 11/10/2000 15:55:17 PST by truth_eagle
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | Top | Last ]
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Wow. Great post. Now this is a vanity Free Republic can be proud of. Awesome effort. If all of what you say holds up
(looks pretty convincing to me), this needs to be disseminated far and wide.
32 Posted on 11/10/2000 15:55:20 PST by RogueIsland
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Just who ARE you Mr. Cook? Up until a few days ago you had never written ONE word here. You are a member since
5/00. Are you on the inside?
33 Posted on 11/10/2000 15:55:33 PST by Professional
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
To: UnBlinkingEye
The actuarial evidence is very credible.
What does this have to do with insurance rates and risks or dividends? Or clerical functions?
Maybe we all need to try to get a little more sleep at nights. It's not going to be over soon.
34 Posted on 11/10/2000 15:55:51 PST by George W. Bush
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | Top | Last ]
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Bump!
35 Posted on 11/10/2000 15:55:54 PST by neutrino (neutrino)
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Amazing theory. Bump.
36 Posted on 11/10/2000 15:56:05 PST by Psicosis
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
great, this is the info I was wanting to see -- printing it out, THANKS.
37 Posted on 11/10/2000 15:56:24 PST by cyn (cynic#456,789)
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
To: Vermonter
Think about this. Since 85% of election volunteers are over 60, and the elderly vote heavily Democratic, where else
would the fraud lean towards? The voting system needs a change.
38 Posted on 11/10/2000 15:56:36 PST by aimhigh
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | Top | Last ]
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
I also noticed that you have interesting bookmarks. Hmmmm.
39 Posted on 11/10/2000 15:57:03 PST by Professional
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
To: BobFromNJ
Just heard on Barry Farber's show that in USA Today, an article inside says that every vote ballot can be traced by the
number corresponding between ballot and name registration! Yes, you heard it right, the vote you cast can be aligned to
your name thus your vote is not actually secret if the government wants to know how you voted.
40 Posted on 11/10/2000 15:57:04 PST by MHGinTN
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | Top | Last ]
To: Thinkin' Gal
w/fond recollections of your fine work!
41 Posted on 11/10/2000 15:59:04 PST by cyn (cynic#456,789)
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
ABSOFREAKINGLUTELY!
THESE 19,000 BALLOTS MUST BE EXAMINED.
They must be examined as you say: Of all the double punches, how many had GORE's "hole" punched through?
I think you are on to something BIG! BUMP!
42 Posted on 11/10/2000 16:00:43 PST by monkeyshine
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
bump! contact bush fast
43 Posted on 11/10/2000 16:00:43 PST by dalebert
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
A little cross-referencing of campaign workers involved in both the '96 and 2000 elections should narrow the number of
possible suspects...
44 Posted on 11/10/2000 16:00:48 PST by Egg
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
If this is true, then the above needs to be in the hands of every Republican senator, congressman, local campaign office,
etc. And to every news outlet that would follow up on this. Fox News, perhaps???Anyone have an email address for
them?
45 Posted on 11/10/2000 16:02:08 PST by Cordova Belle
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
We need to have a large group of Republican voters show up and complain that THEY were confused and voted for Pat
instead of Dubya. Those 3000 votes should go to President-elect Bush...
46 Posted on 11/10/2000 16:02:11 PST by Libloather
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
To: PhiKapMom, Alamo Girl, Jim Robinson
FYI--for the voter fraud file--someone also suggested this be sent to the Bush campaign.
47 Posted on 11/10/2000 16:02:27 PST by golitely
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
This punching-with-the-wire bit is too easy.
I'm sure with some discreet digging you could find this happening all over the country.
I think this system should be replaced, nationwide.
48 Posted on 11/10/2000 16:03:00 PST by ZOOKER
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
To: Robert A. Cook, PE, Michael Rivero
Very persuasive. I wonder if it would be possible to get affidavits (maybe for just one precinct) from more Bush voters
than were recorded as having voted for Bush.
Alternatively, can the people who submitted some of these double-punched ballots be questioned as to how they voted
and as to whether there is any possibility that they might have double-punched?
49 Posted on 11/10/2000 16:03:41 PST by aristeides (demosthenes@olg.com)
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Someone please verify that this has been sent thru the proper channels to the Bush campaign. This is the kind of defense
that will devistate Daley and Co. and make them worry more about jail than the election outcome!!
50 Posted on 11/10/2000 16:03:43 PST by HardStarboard
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Bump! Great theory!
51 Posted on 11/10/2000 16:03:55 PST by Inspector Harry Callahan
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
To: Professional
I've seen Mr.Cook post here quite a few times.
Interesting post.
52 Posted on 11/10/2000 16:04:13 PST by chuck allen
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | Top | Last ]
To: truth_eagle
I meant it!! This is really a brilliant analysis.
In that case, I agree entirely. A brilliant theory. I would love it even more if the GOP could prove absolutely systemic
criminal vote fraud by Democrats on a widespread basis. And not just in Florida either! And James Baker might be just
tough enough to do it. I'll bet that him and Daddy Bush aren't planning to let the election be stolen from Junior if they can
stop it.
bump
53 Posted on 11/10/2000 16:04:19 PST by George W. Bush
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | Top | Last ]
To: Nita Nuprez, Clinton's a liar, John Huang2, Molly Pitcher, PhiKapMom, Miss Marple, tame, DittoJed2
FLAG!
54 Posted on 11/10/2000 16:04:41 PST by Cordova Belle
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | Top | Last ]
To: RightWhale,maica,Hugh Akston,Lazamataz,Registered,PhiKapMom,CHIEF negotiator
Or he could punch 20 at a time and do it much more quickly, and fairly "cleanly".
Please FReepers: read this theory closely and tell what you think of it.
55 Posted on 11/10/2000 16:05:18 PST by Travis McGee
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | Top | Last ]
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Wonder if the double punchers voted republican or democrat elsewhere on the ballot...think about it.
56 Posted on 11/10/2000 16:06:25 PST by MonroeDNA
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
You are the man! Bump!
57 Posted on 11/10/2000 16:06:57 PST by DouglasKC
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
To: Howlin, Mudboy Slim, Lady x, kattracks,Forgiven_Sinner, formerDem, Fred Mertz, Freedom'sWorthIt,
FLAG!!!
58 Posted on 11/10/2000 16:08:00 PST by Cordova Belle
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | Top | Last ]
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
This is just BRILLIANT !
Man, this is what Free Republic was MADE FOR !
59 Posted on 11/10/2000 16:08:02 PST by MassExodus
[ Reply | Privat |
