Electoral College 2000 - Ahead of the Curve Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Electoral College 2000 - Ahead of the Curve

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: David Howe who wrote (2018)	11/12/2000 4:50:08 PM
From: jttmab	Read Replies (1) of 6710

I probably agree with everything in you post. Maybe even the part about totally and completely confused. However, in addition to the count and re-counts you outlined the Bush team requested another machine re-count. In that re-count of the 1%, Gore picked up 27 and Bush lost 3 votes from the previous machine count[paying attention to your Note: on the previous post, one should not have lost votes] I'm pretty certain about the 3 number and it was close to 27 if not 27. I remember reading it on an AP wire. Tried to find it again a few minutes ago, but wasn't successfull. It came out at the same time the county reported the 1% which was around 1:45AM ET --was that this AM or yesterday's AM; I'm confused. The machine re-count hasn't received a lot of press or attention since everyone seems to be enjoying the discussion of chard and light tests so much. <s> But there was an additional machine re-count other than the ones you've identified that paralleled the 1% manual count. Best Regards, jttmab

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next