Formerly About Applied Materials Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials

AMAT 327.01

+2.5%

Jan 16 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Gottfried who wrote (39539)	11/12/2000 5:54:26 PM
From: Robert O	Read Replies (1) of 70976

G: VERY interesting. You must have had your Metawalker on full alert or loom around the csco board. In any event, I just missed an A in Stats so not so qualified, but I’m sure to deserve an A in skepticism. Couldn't one run a number of back tests until some ratio in the formula found a high correlation? Now using his 4.2896 ln(Nominal GDP)certainly attained a high correlation for his time period, but it could be time period related and not apply outside that 'found' range that works. Perhaps from 1975 to today it's well outside 2 deviations. Also, as big tobacco is fond to remind us correlation does not make for causal relationships, necessarily. All that said, how do we get rich from results ;-) RO

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next