SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tejek who wrote (128001)11/13/2000 11:05:42 AM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 1570842
 
Ted what I was specifically referring to was your response to Joe when he said "Something like this (the proposition) doesn't happen in vacuum. There must have been some gross injustice done to someone or a group of people that motivated them to put this on the ballot."

Your response was "Yes, it was the preservation of the environment." To which I replied that an injustice in the name of a good cause is still injustice.
Your response seemed to indicate that you had the opinion that at least minor injustices where just fine as long as they are good for the environment. You may not actually hold this opinion but your post implied that you did.

I was not commenting specifically on the new law. If it truly does allow people to ask for the moon for minor reductions in value of their property then the law might be wrong but the concept behind it is right.

Tim
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News