SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 230.16-4.3%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Pravin Kamdar who wrote (18847)11/13/2000 1:00:18 PM
From: Charles RRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
Pravin,

<I don't remember anytime lately where AMD has exceeded their ASP guidance -- in fact, they have been coming up short. >

Absolutely true.

<For people to speculate that AMD is sandbagging their ASP forecast is to disregard everything we have seen over the last year. >

I agree that there may not be much of sandbagging here. I think AMD revised ASPs in lieu of faster than expected P4 ramp. I would expect to see strong Q1/Q2 ASPs (i.e., > $90) and weaker Q3/Q4 ASPs (probably less than $90 unless there are some commercial volume wins by that time that can skew the mix in favor of Athlons and latops chips compared to Durons)

<80% 1 GHz yield at Dresden may be true, ...>

I can understand people could have underestimated Dresden bin-splits but I don't think anybody should have questions on Dresden bin-splits. AMD management knows better than reporting blatantly wrong information.

<... but from my personal observations, less than 50% of Athlon actually sold at retail are at 1 Ghz (higher than 1 Ghz has not even arrived in any measurable quantity at retail). >

There are two factosrs at play here: AMD over the last year has constantly downbinned its product and not all the production is from Dresden.

I think the first one is the dominant reason. Without corporate design wins, the higher speed grades simply cannot be absorbed by the consumer market. The sales/marketing team at AMD screwed up BIG time to not land a single major NA corporate SKU even after a full year of product advantage. This is a real SHAME.

I should say that there is no good explanation for lack of any 1.2G SKUs from Compaq/HP. For some reason these guys are far behind Gateway (and even Micron now). I think this cannot be explained by the advantages of being direct. There is some other issue here and I would not be surprised if it has to do with protecting ASPs on the corporate systems.

Chuck
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext