Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: tejek who wrote (128404)	11/13/2000 5:24:02 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) of 1580473

This makes it a judgement call and a person's judgement may be biased by which political party he supports. No, because the parameters and their limits were determined before the hand count began, and the count is being overseen by US Marshalls. Even with the parameters it still leaves to much as a judgement call. I would accept the handcount if it was applied state wide and was only looking for ballots that were correctly marked (rather then ones that were incorrectly marked but that seem to indicate a vote for one canidate or another) but neither of these things are true in this case. As for the marhsalls I don't think they have anything to do with decideing how the ballots will be counted, they only provide security for the ballots and make sure that no one tampers with them. Tim

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next