SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 93.38+2.2%Jan 9 9:30 AM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: gnuman who wrote (61187)11/14/2000 12:52:06 PM
From: Dave B  Read Replies (2) of 93625
 
Gene,

PC1000 would still have slightly lower bandwidth than DDR266. 2GB/s vs 2.13GB/s.

When they talk about PC1000 RDRAM, I believe it's really PC1066 (which provides the same theoretical 2.13GB/s bandwidth). This is what you get when you clock PC800 at a core speed of 133Mhz rather 100Mhz. To get PC1000, you'd have to clock it at 125Mhz, and while you probably know better than I, I've never heard that this is one of the standard system multipliers. OTOH, maybe it's easy to do, but every discussion of faster RDRAM that I've ever seen has used a clock of 133Mhz giving PC1066.

Dave
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News