SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Why is Gore Trying to Steal the Presidency?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: lml who wrote (371)11/14/2000 2:34:10 PM
From: Dave Gore  Read Replies (3) of 3887
 
lml, if my thesis is naive then Bush himself and the other
states who have enacted the manual recount into law are wrong!

The whole idea is that the count be as accurate as possible especially for a more accurate resolution of a close election. No one is saying it will be perfect, but it is certainly naive and very wrong to say that we might as well be satisfied with 96% accuracy when we could have 99% accurate. That's plain stupid and un-American, lml!

For anyone to say that the machines are more accurate at counting bent cards and partially punched holes is an idiot.

The manual count is embedded in state laws so that the will of the people is as closely followed as possible. Surely even you must admit that the states allowed for manual recounts for that reason?!

PS-- Maybe you don't understand, NO one is saying that the machine can't count the non-bent, completely puched cards with good precision.

YOU SAID:
Dave:

No I'm not kidding. Your analysis is naive and flawed. You hold this ideal that elections should and need to be perfect. The fact is
they're not, never have, but we should strive to make them as perfect as they can be, but NOT necessarily for this election.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext