VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Nick who wrote (16110)	11/14/2000 2:55:27 PM
From: Dr. Id	Read Replies (1) of 65232

I say give it to lame duck Bush. He won't be able to get anything done, including those massive tax cuts. W can't hurt our nation by paying off its debt, as long we have AG in charge. Then in 2002, Dems take over Congress, and Gore can come back with a landslide in 2004, and keep the WH in Dems' hands for a long time to come. Nick, You've got this half right. I agree that Bush will be a one-term, impotent President (just like the 3 others who won electoral college votes and lost the popular). He won't be able to do much harm, and will have a tough time getting reactionaries onto the Supreme Court. However, hopefully the Dems will come up with a decent candidate in 2004. If Gore had been halfway a competent candidate, he would have mopped the floor with a weak candidate like doubya. His campaign ineptness rivaled Dukakis. I predict that both of them will be losers in 2004. Dr.Id@maybejustwishfulthinking.com

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next