SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Rande Is . . . HOME
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Rande Is who wrote (41406)11/15/2000 3:05:57 PM
From: Joe Smith  Read Replies (2) of 57584
 
Last time, when a neutral bias was much less likely, you "turned on a dime" when they left in the hawkish bias. Why the change? Is it that we already at 3100, the low end of the trading range?

EDIT...I rarely question Alan G, but I wonder why we were no thrown more of a bone. 2.7% growth last Q, with the effects of the increases in interest rates not even fully in effect. I think that they just cannot stand 4% unemployment. They need to see people kicked out of work. This scares me a bit. Like they are looking for more than a soft landing.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News