SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Don Lloyd who wrote (85519)11/15/2000 5:11:38 PM
From: Michael Bakunin  Read Replies (1) of 132070
 
Don, please follow madison.hss.cmu.edu and follow the links there. I find some of the papers quite compelling. If you have criticism of the stats work, do post it. To your points: the '96 result is a rhetorical red herring; I know I'm supposed to look at the raw totals, but you forget that 1996 was a different time in which Buchanan polled much better in FL statewide than in 2000; PBC was no outlier that year. I remain befuddled by the lack of expected "roll off" in the US senate vote vs the Gore vote. One of the papers explicitly compares the PBC Gore/Nelson vote against a control, Leon County -- this ends up buttressing the criticisms of the 'butterfly'. As for the FL state senate, I have no data, but can think of plenty of explanations. Recall: I am nonpartisan here (I hate both main candidates), but I do have an education in mathematics. I find the academic work convincing, with particular fondness for Henry Brady's paper (UCB link) and the Harvard one. FD: I've met Henry. -mb
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext