SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (37893)11/15/2000 7:57:32 PM
From: KeepItSimple  Read Replies (8) of 436258
 
>a recount supposedly corrects the errors of the first count, it doesn't
>address the question of voter competence.

you're forgetting that there are machine recounts, and human recounts. so far there is no county that has conducted more than one human recount. someone posted a great article about how democrats love to steal elections with hand recounts earlier, i dont still have the link.

the gist is that democrats are usually more likely to not have the strength to push the chad all the way through, so you end up with dangling chads, half door chads, and so on. every time that ballot is physically handled increases the chances that chad will eventually work loose enough to be counted as a vote.

the democratic goon they interviewed for the story bragged about how he stole several elections in california. his method was basically:

demand a recount
count again
keep counting.
if you're still not ahead, count AGAIN
and if that doesnt work, recount AGAIN.
once you're ahead, stop.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News