PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: w0z who wrote (77704)	11/16/2000 11:15:29 AM
From: microhoogle!	Read Replies (3) of 769670

Would someone please explain why a mechanical vote count is biased more toward one party versus another? At least a machine is brutally consistent which is more than one can say for any human being. The machine is brutally consistent to have missed too many votes for Al Gore while on the face of it, it is a miniscule number, but big enough to make or break this election. Mechanical vote count is found to be biased against Al Gore where there are majority of democrats and biased against GW B where the counties have republican majority. They were not designed to be bias, but it got introduced by virtue of not punching chads out completely. Normally these are ignored, but in this elections, they should be taken into account to determine the will of the people than arbitrarily declare a winner who appears to be leading at this stage.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next