<< Exactly how does the killing of a baby, after passing nearly totally through the birth canal, protect the life of a pregnant woman? >>
That depends upon the unique situation, observed by a medically licensed doctor, upon the patient. This is an easy call. Outlaw PBA, except in the case where a woman's life or health is endangered. This tells women that their life and health is to be protected, and also satisfies those that are against abortion.
It is called a compromise, and a good, justified one.
That is why conservatives are called radical. They are unwilling to compromise their dogma, no matter who it hurts. They live by voodoo, witch doctor rules and laws.
PBA would already have been restricted, if the conservatives hadn't been so radical, and uncaring for the pregnant mother. It proves, to me, that conservatives really don't care about the unborn fetus, only their dogma. If congress had passed a ban against PBA, respecting a pregnant woman's life or health, it would have already been signed into law, and many unborn fetuses might have been saved. Instead, if you are correct, many healthy fetuses have been aborted thru PBA, that otherwise would have lived. This is hypocrisy at it's greatest, and shows how phony the sanctimonious right-to-lifers really are.
Why are you so scared of protecting the life or health of a pregnant woman? |
