Fortune Minerals Limited (TSE - FT) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Fortune Minerals Limited (TSE - FT)

FT 8.120

+0.6%

Jan 14 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Elizabeth Andrews who wrote (506)	11/16/2000 8:14:00 PM
From: Richnorth	Read Replies (1) of 612

Oh my God, it would appear you are still reading without your glasses! Maybe the lenses need to be changed. Or perhaps the circulation in the upper storey has to be improved to enable an open (as opposed to narrow or restricted) interpretation of everything you perceive. In regard to bismuth, what I meant was, if you think the value of FT is now zilch, then bismuth's contribution would make the value of FT non-zero. <ggg> I did not imply FT's deliverance/salvation lies in bismuth. To be sure, the value of the bismuth would be accretive to the value of FT. The clock is ticking......... I am still waiting for your irrefutable proof that FT is not worth a dime.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next