Scumbria,
Check this out.
Some colleagues asked, what went on here. Here is my own sworn testimony
to the DNC -- Richard Yellin.
I came to my voting precinct at the St. Thomas More Church in Boynton
Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, at 6 30 am on Election day 2000. I was
fifth in line waiting for the precinct to open. By the time it opened,
about 30 people had already lined up, and by the time I exited from the
poll at 7:15, 100+ individuals were waiting to enter a very crowded
precinct area. I was fully prepared to vote my choices with my own
pre-prepared list of candidate selections and referendum choices. I came
early to vote because I had to be at my Synagogue, by 8 am to speak at a
morning religious service.
When I entered the precinct I signed the voter register and received the
"computerized ballot." I went to a cubicle on a desk that had a
"votamatic" platform which had a "butterfly brochure" fixed on the
platform, with pages of the brochure to be turned sequentially so that
candidates and referendum questions could be "hole punched," i.e., voted
for. I followed the instructions placing the ballot into the slot so that
it could be properly fixed and aligned under the "butterfly" so that the
holes on the "butterfly" lined up over the computerized "ballot."
At that point I started the voting process. I wanted to vote for
Gore/Lieberman. I searched for the Gore "butterfly hole" and could not
find it!! The arrows to the right of the candidate's name, pointing to
the proper "butterfly hole" did not align properly !! I struggled to find
the appropriate place for my vote, and tried to figure out which one it
was by looking at the Bush "hole" and the others on the page. By a
process of elimination, I chose the hole I thought was for Gore and
Lieberman. I took 3-4 minutes to do this. It made me feel rather stupid,
so I hid my stupidity, figuring that I voted my choice. I went on to all
the other candidates on the next pages of the "butterfly" and the
alignments to the proper holes were arranged neatly and to perfection,
and I was out of the little cubicle (which was not very private in the
least!), and I took out my "ballot from the "butterfly" and placed it in
the ballot box upon leaving.
As I left I heard 2-5 people complaining that it was difficult to vote
for President and V.P. I did not have time to consult with these
individuals because I had my appointments. As I drove away, I had a
gnawing feeling that something was not right, with the blame on me. I had
a sample mock "butterfly" that was mailed out before the election, and I
looked at it briefly while driving and I saw that it did not look
anything like the "butterfly" that was attached to the "votamatic." At
which point I dismissed the experience and went about driving.
At 7:45 am, when I came to my synagogue, (of which I am the Rabbi and
Spiritual Leader), Temple Emeth of Delray Beach, a 2800 member
congregation of retired senior citizens, our parking lot was a beehive of
activity. A voting precinct is housed in our facility's auditorium, and
it had lines waiting to go into vote. I went into my office to prepare my
sermon and at 8:10 I went out of my office passing the voting precinct
waving to many voters whom I knew. I rushed past the auditorium and went
into the Chapel and began the service with a sermonette on the subject of
voting and religious freedom. I told my prayers that in order to be
religious, they had to vote, because political freedom is the guarantor
of religious freedom. At exactly 8:20 am my speech was interrupted by a
synagogue Staff member who said to me in front of the 60 people in the
chapel, "There is a problem in the precinct," and he summoned me to the
precinct. My 7:15 emotions began to gnaw at me again.
I entered the precinct ahead of the lines and I was told by several
people leaving that they had trouble voting their choice for President.
In fact one person was crying that she thought she had mistakenly voted
for Buchanan.
I summoned the supervisor of the precinct housed in our facility and I
asked her to get the butterfly ballot from one of the "votamatics" and to
look at it together with me. Two or three other people gather around, and
it was the identical "butterfly" that I had used at the Church. I said to
the supervisor that the arrows are completely misaligned with the holes
and therefore the ballots could not be punched, expressing with certainty
the intent of the voter. She agreed, and I asked her to interrupt the
voting in the precinct and I told her that the precinct should be closed
until an announcement was made to all those voting, that 'the "butterfly
brochure" was problematic, and that people should exercise great care.'
I said to her that the supervisor of elections in Palm Beach and in
Florida should be called immediately. She agreed. The phone lines to the
election board were busy. She made the announcements, and I went to call
all the media outlets in the area -- 3 TV stations and the radio station
of record.
At which point, I felt I did my duty and I went into the synagogue office
and began listening to people exiting from the precinct who complained
that it was an impossible experience, and how they think they voted for
Buchanan by mistake because of the "butterfly." At that point, I too put
2 and 2 together and I think I may have voted for Buchanan, a vote that
would be anathema to my whole political disposition.
By 9:15 I had meetings in my office and duties to attend to, and thought
that others had been sufficiently apprised of the situation and that it
was in hand. Wrong, by mid day all hell broke loose in the media.
Addenda: On Friday night November 10, I had planned to speak about
Kritallnacht, the Rabin Assassination, and Veterans Day. Instead, before
500 people I asked them to shared their voting experience during election
day. Several people got up to speak and told their stories that they had
trouble with the "butterfly" in trying to vote for Gore, and they think
they voted for Buchanan. (It is important to know that my congregation
has well over 100 holocaust survivors, and no one would have knowingly
voted for Buchanan. I took a referendum on that!)
At which point several people in the congregation began to laugh at those
who expressed a problem with the vote! I asked those who were laughing to
explain their lamentable public ridicule. They said they voted, and it
was a piece of cake. I then asked them to explain why it was easy for
them. They said their "butterfly" was lined up correctly and all they had
to do was follow the arrows for the candidates and punch the holes.
In response, those who had the problem, said publicly that they had a
DIFFERENT LOOKING "BUTTERFLY" AND THE ARROWS WERE MISPRINTED. I then took
a tabulation. "If you thought the votamatic was easy to use, raise your
hands." 50% raised their hands. Then: "If you were troubled by the vote
and think you may have voted incorrectly for Gore because of your
"butterfly", raise your hands." 30% raised their hands. 20% were unsure.
The conclusion of this "Town Hall" sermonic discussion!? There were two
different versions of the "butterfly" or maybe even a partial misprint of
the butterflies used by many voters in various precincts of Palm Beach
County.
I tried the same experiment on Saturday morning to an even larger crowd,
dispensing with the planned sermon, asking people to share their voting
experiences. The Saturday morning congregation is made up of different
people than the Friday night congregation. To my amazement the same thing
happened again. People laughed, and slowly they came to the realization
that there were 2 different versions to the "butterfly." The tabulation
was virtually the same as the previous night.
Conclusion: The real problem is the "butterfly" brochure. There were
misprints in the alignment of arrows and holes, and there were bad
"butterflies" hovering within and mingling with normal "butterflies," and
the way you could predict who received infected misprinted "butterflies,"
was to scan the precincts where Buchanan received greater numbers of
votes than expected compared to all the other 50+ counties in Florida.
It just so happens that the Buchanan factor surfaced most within Jewish
and Afro-American areas and precincts. As an Afro-American pastor friend
of mine said, "there is no one in his congregation who would for a moment
think of voting for Pat Buchanan." Buchanan subsequently went on air
saying he knew that these exaggerated votes, close to 3500 in Palm Beach
County, "should not have gone to him."
The real question for these 3500 suspected votes: Why doesn't the
government impound all the "butterflies" and search for the misprinted
ones.
The media is totally confused by this, and it is no wonder that the
former Secretary of State, The Honorable James Baker, could hold up a
normal "butterfly," and unconscionably imply, that elderly, Jewish,
Afro-Ameircans, and Palm Beach County citizens, were "confused" (implying
'stupid'). Mr. Baker, in this case, was really "holier than thou",
meaning, of course Bush voters were not confused because their candidate
was the first on the list, and you could not mistake punching the Bush
"butterfly" hole because it was at the top of the column of holes, i.e.,
"holier than thou."
I do not believe in conspiracies! I am a registered independent voter who
learned as a child: "It is not who won or lost, but how we played the
game." In this election, the voting machinery was flawed, not the
electorate! |
