SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 215.00+0.7%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Petz who wrote (19455)11/17/2000 2:13:42 PM
From: tejekRead Replies (2) of 275872
 
Petz

ted, whoever wrote that article about Edelstone was clueless

Not really....look at the title..."not quite negative growth"...I took it as a sarcastic reaction to Edelstone's positive spin on a negative situation.

Edelstone points out that the situation isn't quite as dire as it appears because an extraordinary gain on the sale of shares of Micron (MU:NYSE - news - boards) in 2000 will make 2001 a "tough compare."

"isn't quite as dire?" - quite the opposite. The reporter exactly reversed the obvious conclusion that Intel will look bad because the Y2000 capital gains can't be completed.


Again, that's Edelstone's spin...he's always been in love with Intel.

The fact remains, says Edelstone, that Intel faces the risk of eroding gross margins during the year because of competition and a product transition.

In other words, not only will the investment results be decreasing, but the operating results as well.


Forget the spin....its Edelstone's factual comments that affirm what you and Goutama have been saying for some time.

Maybe its time you guys became ANALysts! LOL

ted
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext